![]() Last year, I resigned as head of the Department of Homeland Security’s Disinformation Governance Board, a policy-coordination body that the Biden administration let founder amid criticism mostly from the right. Read: We haven’t seen the worst of fake news Yet policy makers have all but ignored an urgent AI problem that is already affecting many lives, including mine. Many commentators have been tying themselves in knots over the potential threats posed by artificial intelligence-deepfake videos that tip elections or start wars, job-destroying deployments of ChatGPT and other generative technologies. The only emotion I felt as I informed my lawyers about the latest violation of my privacy was a profound disappointment in the technology-and in the lawmakers and regulators who have offered no justice to people who appear in porn clips without their consent. For more than a year, I have been the target of a widespread online harassment campaign, and deepfake porn-whose creators, using artificial intelligence, generate explicit video clips that seem to show real people in sexual situations that never actually occurred-has become a prized weapon in the arsenal misogynists use to try to drive women out of public life. But to be fair, it wasn't meant to be.Recently, a Google Alert informed me that I am the subject of deepfake pornography. It's a digestible film, even an enjoyable one, but in the end it's not really interesting or memorable. If you liked the book, or want to learn what this whole Hunger Games thing is about without having to read the book, you'll probably like this. The movie has the things that happened in the book, but in a movie, competently shot and acted, with absolutely no risks taken. I could go on about the particulars of the adaptation - the ridiculousness of the entire Capital setting, or the sometimes disorienting shakycam work, or the great cast of adults patiently playing supporting characters - or the source material - the gestures at social commentary, the way that the story protects Katniss from ever having to morally sully herself - but they all seem to be beside the point. It just exists as a spectacle, a finished product that defies any critical lens. There's almost nothing to say about a movie like The Hunger Games - it's been so worked to death to be a successful blockbuster that all of its edges, the things that make a film good or bad, have disappeared. ![]() However, the US PG-13 version was submitted to the BBFC for the UK Blu-ray release, which was classified '15' uncut. This pre-cut version was released on DVD in the UK with a 12 rating. The BBFC then gave the film a 12A rating for cinema release. Blood splashes were digitally removed from both impacts to bodies and blood on blades of weapons, achieved through the darkening of certain shots and by digitally erasing blood from the image. When the finished film was submitted to the BBFC for a formal classification, the BBFC stated that more cuts would be needed in order to secure the 12A. These included the use of alternate footage and the digital removal of blood. Four scenes were changes, removing bloody violence, threat and a scene of injury. The BBFC explained a 12A rating would be likely if the violence was toned down. A rough cut of the film was submitted to the BBFC in the UK for an advisory screening, a process used by filmmakers to see how likely a film will obtain a certain rating.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |